Useful numbers.
Visible assumptions.
Burnline publishes articles about food logging, the limits of calorie estimates and the design of its iPhone app. The articles are published by the same product that appears in their examples and recommendations.
Sources and editorial approach
Research explanations link to studies, public-health guidance or food-composition documentation. Product comparisons identify their sources and distinguish developer claims from hands-on tests. A study of one method is not presented as an accuracy test of Burnline.
Worked calculations and diagrams explain the arithmetic with stated assumptions. An illustrative meal is labelled as an example; it is not treated as a laboratory measurement. Screenshots supplied by other developers are identified as promotional material.
Who is behind the material?
The byline “Burnline” identifies the publishing product. Articles may use AI assistance for research, drafting, illustrations and implementation. This byline does not imply authorship or review by a clinician. A specialist review is credited only when a named reviewer has actually completed it.
Dates and corrections
Each article keeps its original publication date. The updated date records substantive revisions to its content, sources or explanation. A product comparison also states when its feature sources were checked; an editorial change does not imply that every app was tested again.
If a source, calculation or product detail needs correcting, contact Burnline support with the article link and the relevant passage.
What the articles can help with
These are general explanations of tracking and research. They cannot assess an individual’s symptoms, dietary needs or treatment. Product-design articles describe interface decisions, not clinical validation of a calorie target.